Handy Man Source » HHO Water Power » Hydrogen Fuel Cell electric bike
Hydrogen Fuel Cell electric bike
clean vehicle For more products info, visit www.intelligent-energy.com and read the latest news about this ENV bike.
Written by Handy Man
Local Handyman looking for ways to receive free energy and power without the high costs of the power companies.
Filed under: HHO Water Power · Tags: Bike, Cell, Electric, Electric Bike, Electric Vehicle, Env Bike, fuel, Fuel Cell Electric, Hydrogen, Hydrogen Cell, Hydrogen Fuel Cell, Intelligent Energy
@AndrewKlilly Until a breakthrough in battery technology, electric vehicle is still not good for long distance travel. Keep an eye on carbon nanotubes batteries. That may turn the table around.
@AndrewKlilly Batteries have their own problems and limitations. You can refill a fuel cell quickly (assuming the refueling infrastructure is established). Recharging the batteries takes too long. e.g. drive a Tesla sport car from Seattle to LA. After about 3.5 hours of driving, you’d need to stop at the recharging station for 8 hours before continuing. A 18 hour trip becomes 48 hours. Capacity, recharging time, longevity, weight, cost, polluting manufacturing process etc. are problems.
Why not just use batteries??? They are more efficient than hydrogen cells anyways.!
@cplai I am absolutely terrified that the cooperations and government will discover my true identity, however, I am willing to take that risk just to warn my fellow Americunts aboot this treachery.
Five years later and … can you buy one? NOPE!
@caiusbritannicus1 Well said. But were you worried about your own safety by revealing so much secret?
THATS SO RETARDED!!! Everyone knows that hydrogen isn’t even a real element, its a fake element developed by the nazis during WWII as a propaganda for hydrogen bombs.. Even Albert Einstein states in one of his works that is is impossible for an atom to have a molar mass of less than 1.49993 grams/mole. This is proof that hydrogen isn’t real, and these bikes are actually powered by antimatter, however the government would never admit it because they make way too much money from this secret.
Also nuclear power plants create zero greenhouse gasses and the electricity is really cheap to create. The up side is the waste can be converted in the future to clean power when nuclear fusion reactors are created (30-70years from now) that can then burn the nuclear waste and only create energy as a byproduct.
Water = 2 Parts Hydrogen 1 Part Oxygen you may be familiar with a process called electrolysis. Using Clean solar/wind/tidal/Water Damn or even Nuclear power to fuel this process you get hydrogen and oxygen. When the two a burnt, or used in a fuel cell process only water is created as a waste product. The reason I classify nuclear as a clean energy source is the sheer amount of power to waste ratio is so high its in comparison as if a coal plant only produced 100lb of CO2 emissions a year.
@kdc43
Water = 2 Parts Hydrogen 1 Part Oxygen you may be familiar with a process called electrolysis. Using Clean solar/wind/tidal/Water Damn or even Nuclear power to fuel this process you get hydrogen and oxygen. When the two a burnt, or used in a fuel cell process only water is created as a waste product.
@kdc43 electic is the answer on the long run. Humanity faces some major changes on the next 10 years, is not the power of the atom the most easy way to create huge amounts of cheap energy? The way we use the atom is just like the way children play…first we brake the things an after that we try to create better ones. For the guy that likes having gas on his bike to travel for long….come on dude
First petrol car was driving only 10 miles… where do you want to go?
Then i think we are in agreement. Getting hydrogen from fossil fuel is not clean. Same argument on electric cars that get energy from a coal-fired power plant. If these people cannot get clean hydrogen or electricity, simply use gas without going through two lossy conversions. Hydroelectric, wind power, and solar power can produce clean hydrogen.
You are QUITE WRONG. Today’s hydrogen fuel is made from natural gas, a fossil fuel, it would be easier to use gas….the pipe lines and stations are here already. My above answer implies hydrogen from fossil fuels would defeat the purpose of conserving the earth. How am I wrong??? My question is what non-fossil or non- nuclear energy source would you use to split water into oxygen and hydrogen? Fairy Dust? POOF! We ‘magicaly’ make hydrogen out of water???
You are quite wrong. Hydrogen can also come from water. It would defeat the purpose of conserving Earth if you make hydrogen out of fossil fuel. Either clean hydrogen or no hydrogen at all. Fossil based hydrogen is simply stupid.
The hydrogen comes from FOSSIL FUEL. Where else are we gonna get hydrogen?
Is simpler to use gasoline or petrol.
The mileage on this bike seems quite low. 4 hours of driving, 160km range… I’m quite happy with my 4 cylinder motorcycle, thanks.
i’d rather have hyd. than gas, alot better for the enviornment and it’s just cool. Even thought it’s expansive it will replace gas son enouph, just you wait.
hydrogen is so much more money
honestly I love it, much , the price 6000 bux is a bit high , but by the time will get lower! thx
@Kingcammel Once well protected, there’s no significant risk. Do you think that carrying 10 liters of gasoline between your legs is safer ? Let me remind you that gas is a much more energetic fuel for the same quantity …
@cplai Hydrogene was not the cause of the fire, but for sure that’s what burnt the hindenburg up.
aaaahhgg ,where buy ? where? i sleeping
where…aahhg
@ cplai that square at the end was ment to be a smiley. just a light hearted statment.
oh i see, sorry i thought you were refering to seperation then pushing hydrogen though a combustion engine. I had not seen the cells untill i just looked them up. how interesting. Thanks
@Kingcammel you are not burning Hydrogen with oxygen, you are using hydrogen with oxygen to produce an electrical current by way of a fuel cell. There are about eight different types of fuel cells. the byproduct of creating an electrical charge by pumping hydrogen into one side of the cell and O2 in to the other side with the use of a solid electrolite is water which in turn can be used to start the whole process over.